Wednesday, December 1, 2010

"for life's not a paragraph..."

“since feeling is first
who pays any attention
to the syntax of things…
for life's not a paragraph…”

-e.e. cummings, since feeling is first

Life is not a paragraph. It is not governed by the tyrannical grammarians armed with their red ink pens brimming to wreak havoc on our expression. Nothing in life is as neat as Strunk and White would have you believe. Life, while it can demand rigor, cannot demand arbitrary adherence. When you need to breathe, well, just throw down a comma. Whether the clause really begins there, it is your Life, it is your clause, and you can make it your own. And if it is more than a breath, might one suggest simply taking a rest. Put down a period. You’ll be able to pick up where you left off. It is your life—you’re doing the writing. And just expect, my friends, for those occasional epiphanies which come in the strangest of times, in the oddest of ways. Be armed with an onomonopiac and an exclamation point. Forget prudence or so-called “good manners;” if you want to shout, I say shout. It is just as Bradbury reminds us, “If they give you ruled paper, write the other way.” Regulations cannot be systematized. Expectations are one thing, but the details cannot be micro-managed. We must simply have faith in the humanity of Humanity, else why do we even care to protect it with our regulations. We devise systems to ensure optimal opportunity for humanity to express itself. Over time, these systems take on a life of their own—we forget that they began at an arbitrary point of history—they begin as a means to an end, and not an end in themselves. Systems would help us reach God; at least that was the claim. But even if you bought into that tenuous claim, the systems didn’t become gods. Yet that is where we are, in the midst of the Callistratus Idolatry.

You simply must refuse to live according to the pattern of Introduction—Corpus—Conclusion. You cannot let each day be tied to a single topic sentence with three supporting points and a summation. Reason is really only useful to Man if it permits Man to be. Rules must support life, not become a cancer. The heart cannot be abandoned or worse yet, quashed by rubrics. The syntax of things is vaster than the rules can anticipate. We are not dealing merely with words in this world. Nor are we dealing with simple ideas. But we also are dealing with hearts and souls—depositories of infinitude and life from whence fateful courses emerge. We cannot harness that. We cannot rein it in. No system is so comprehensive as to contain the ability to detain infinity.

Embrace life simply. Sometimes we must conclude before we begin. This is what Life calls resolve. Sometimes we must stumble around before we find the point, the thesis. That is what Life calls discernment. Sometimes we must begin with a particular notion only to discover that somewhere through the course of justifying it that we actually conclude otherwise. That is what Life calls living. Life is not in the structure of the sentences, but in the movements, in the spaces not only between words, but between letters. Life is in the contact of the pencil point to the paper being pulled along loopily and lifted purposefully. It is all over the paper—in the doodles, in the smudges, in the coffee stains, in the crinkles, in the indentations in the margins made by the desperate struggle to revive a dying pen. But it is even beyond all of this. For Life is beyond the very margins. Nothing contains life. There is no universal acid that can pierce its dignity. Frankly, this is because Life is the universal acid itself—it is the force whose dignity cuts through all. Its preservation, its growth, its sustenance takes precedence in all of history. It is the enduring and prevailing supersession of any theory of containment—whether it be grammar, political, or religious. Life dictates and will not be dictated to. It is not a paragraph because it is the source of paragraphs. There is more in an ounce of love than in a warehouse of dissertations—“The best gesture of my brain is less than / your eyelid’s flutter which says / we are for each other:”—because it is from Love that Life springs. Thus, if it is Life you are interested in, then Love you must find. The longer you wait, the more Death has already prevailed upon you—for loneliness and isolation are but the foyer to the grave. The hardened heart of a rule-zealous Stoic will be the very rock from which his tombstone is chiseled.

“Wholly to be a fool…” Life is in the foolishness prolonged by the ellipsis. I fancy that the three periods are tokens given to the wayfarer to tote alongside to sprinkle intermittently along his course. For it is here he will find the stuff of Life, the experience of Love, the opportunity to be lost, to be found, to take wrong turns, to know the hot and cold, to think about being wise and to share enduring kisses. Yes, there will be a story. Its order, however, will not be determined by the rules of grammar, but simply by the path and steps of our traveler. It is he who will put the periods where they belong…

1 comment:

  1. I agree with you very much, and I don't agree too. Life is not a paragraph, except when it is. I might suggest Fr. Hardon's "and": Life isn't a paragraph AND it is. Of course, I love your grammatical imagery! And why does it work? Because as well as being partially arbitrary, grammar is also partially true. If grammatical rules were completely arbitrary, then suggesting throwing down a comma as an image for taking a breath in life would not work. The fact of the matter is that there is some real connection between grammar and communication. Of course, the grammarian can be pedantic. (I, for one, think that we could use a bit more of such pedantry these days, but leave that aside.) I think that the rules of grammar are fundamentally descriptive rather than prescriptive. That is, they approximate what is rather than laying down what ought to be. But at some point they become the benchmark for what ought to be, and at that point they can become silly. Enough said!

    I fear sounding like a relativist! Yikes! On this continuum, I see you falling on one side and myself on the other -- not so much about grammar as about life. (Actually, I think you are more of a grammarian than I am!) You are right that life is not a paragraph, especially as we experience it. But then it is too, especially from the point of view of eternity. Let me leave you with lines from that great classicist, Alexander Pope:
    "Cease, then, nor Order imperfection name;
    Our proper bliss depends on what we blame.
    Know thy own point: this kind, this due degree
    Of blindness, weakness, Heav'n bestows on thee.
    Submit: in this or any other sphere,
    Secure to be as bless'd as thou canst bear;
    Safe in the hand of one disposing Power,
    Or in the natal or the mortal hour.
    All Nature is but Art unknown to thee;
    All chance direction, which thou canst not see;
    All discord, harmony not understood;
    All partial evil, universal good:
    And spite of Pride, in erring Reason's spite,
    One truth is clear, Whatever is, is right."

    And, in a grammatical vein:
    True ease in writing comes from art, not chance,
    As those move easiest who have learn'd to dance

    ReplyDelete